Social or antisocial?

While we are a most generous nation, donating through church, United Way, and hundreds of other organizations, why is it that we cannot come to an agreement on providing national assistance to the low income earners in the form of “social” medicine?

A minimum wage earner – and yes we are dependent on him or her cleaning our house, raking our yard, keeping our surgical rooms, aircraft and public lavatories clean, our fast food cooked and our roads swept – ought to be able to provide decent healthcare to his or her child, shouldn’t he?

Giving back a little to provide a semi-standard healthcare to the lowest 50% of our population should not cause that much anger.

Had this been a fellow member of your church, your synagogue, or your Rotary Club, the checks would have come out without question. Let’s just try to expand this generosity just a tad.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s